Whatever
homage for Hitchcock was intended, "What Lies Beneath" is not fit to
be on the same shelf as "Rear Window." Why? Hitchcock movies are intelligent,
winding around the story and characters. "What Lies Beneath" uses spooky
music and scenes that jump out and calls it disturbing.
"Ghostbusters"
is scarier.
What
is disturbing is Harrison Ford's choice to be involved. What was he thinking when
he signed on? He's a favorite actor for me. He's starred in "Star Wars,"
"Indiana Jones," "The Fugitive" and "Mosquito Coast."
Good stuff. Until this.
Ford's
credibility as an actor is not shaken. He carries each scene of this meandering
movie. Bad plotlines are confused as tricky storytelling, and even Ford can't
take a Saturday-matinee and turn it into a Friday-night blockbuster.
Does
the movie adequately refer to Hitchcock classics? Who cares? That sort of thing
is only interesting when the referring movie succeeds on its own. This doesn't.
That's the same problem Ang Lee had when making "The Hulk." He spent
so much time of mimicking a style that he forgot to make a good movie.
The
Plot:
Happy couple lives in Vermont. The wife is being spooked but does
not know why. The husband does not seem to understand. The ghost slowly reveals
its intentions, and the happy couple's life unravels. The big finish is not expected,
and the only redeeming part of this 130 minute couch-sit.
About
the story:
Connections are never made as to why the ghost waits a year
to do some haunting, and why it took the measures involved. Nor, why it thinks
Claire "knows" why she's being haunted when she fully demonstrates she
has no idea.
The
ghost tries to kill Norman, Ford's character. If that's all it wants, why does
it need Claire, Michelle Pfeiffer's character and Norman's wife?
Subplots
involving the quirky neighbors are never sorted out.
"What
Lies Beneath" as a title is misleading. I can't go into this more for the
sake of ruining the story for those of you who will wind up still seeing it.
In
all, the movie will be forgotten, played late at night in the time slot reserved
for exercise equipment commercials. The movie is not awful, and better than a
rerun of that infomercial with Chuck Norris. It is just that Harrison Ford, and
costar Michelle Pfeiffer can and have done better.
Looking
for a real thriller? See the Hitchcock movies that this is being compared. "Rear
Window" with Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly is a great place to begin.
Anthony
Trendl